For many observers, the debates over the Texas state have shown that the federal government is clearly in favor of slavery. Texas President Sam Houston reached an agreement with Polk and was granted union admission to Texas in 1845. The anti-slavery northern countries were also concerned about the accession of Florida, which joined the Union in 1845 as a slave state. The year 1845 became a decisive year in the memory of the leaders of slavery. When the Americans accepted calls to follow their apparent fate, anti-slave voices viewed developments in Florida and Texas as a sign that the section crisis had taken a damaging and perhaps irretrievable turn. Dred Scott was born a slave in Virginia between 1795 and 1800. In 1820 he followed his owner Peter Blow to Missouri. In 1832, Blow died and the U.S. Army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, bought Scott and took him to Illinois, a free state.

In 1836 Scott was again transferred to Wisconsin, where slavery was “forbidden forever” under the Missouri compromise. In 1846 Dred tried to gain his freedom, but the Emerson family refused, prompting Scott to appeal. The section crisis had finally become a national crisis. “Bleeding Kansas” was the first place to show that the section crisis could and was easily in national crisis. When it became more suggestive, Kansas attracted activists who represented the extreme aspects of the slavery debate. Explain why Dred Scott`s decision exacerbated the agricultural sectoral conflict, which had no prospect as a major cotton producer in the lower Missouri River from which this new state was to be formed. Suitable for a varied agriculture, the only crop considered promising for slavery was the cultivation of hemp. On this basis, southern plantation pots migrated to Missouri with their cats, and the slave population grew from 3,100 in 1810 to 10,000 in 1820. Of the total population of 67,000, slaves accounted for about 15%. [18] John Brown wrote these words just before he fell out of the gallows and was sentenced to death by the United States.